Classification, Phylogeny and the Diversity of Life
Evidence for evolutionary relationships, cladograms, taxa, binomial names, dichotomous keys, First Peoples classification by use, and the domains and kingdoms.
🎯 By the end of this lesson
- Distinguish homologous from analogous traits and explain why only homologous traits indicate relationship.
- Evaluate the six lines of evidence used to infer phylogenetic relationships.
- Read a cladogram, identify clades, sister taxa and shared derived characters.
- List the taxa from domain to species and classify an organism using them.
- Write scientific names correctly using binomial nomenclature.
- Use and construct a dichotomous key.
- Describe examples of First Peoples classification of animals and BC plants by use and compare them with Linnaean classification.
- Compare the domains and kingdoms using unifying criteria.
- Explain, using examples, why classification models change as new knowledge emerges.
1Overview
Scientists have catalogued about 1.5 million species, and estimates suggest up to 100 million more remain unidentified. Making sense of that many organisms requires a system: a way to name them, group them, and show how they are related. Classification is a human tool, and like every scientific tool it keeps changing as new evidence arrives. This lesson covers the evidence used to work out relationships, the principles of taxonomy, the knowledge systems of First Peoples for classifying animals and plants, and the domains and kingdoms of life.
2Evidence for phylogenetic relationships
A phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a group of organisms. Because the past cannot be observed directly, biologists build hypotheses about relationships from several kinds of evidence. The curriculum names six.
| Evidence | What it shows | Example |
|---|---|---|
| DNA | Greater similarity in DNA sequences generally tracks closer relationship | DNA suggests a hippopotamus may be the whale's closest living relative, even though it resembles a pig more |
| Biochemistry | Shared molecules and pathways, such as proteins, indicate shared ancestry; protein sequences can be compared like DNA | All cells use the same genetic code; proteins such as cytochrome c and hemoglobin differ between species by amounts that reflect relationship |
| Anatomy | Homologous structures (shared ancestry) versus analogous structures (similar function, independent origin) | Bat and bird wing bones are homologous; insect and bird wings are analogous |
| Embryology | Similar early development suggests shared ancestry | Vertebrate embryos, including humans, develop gill slits and tails |
| Fossil evidence | Dated fossils show past forms and the sequence of change | Fossil horses and humans show change in body form over millions of years |
| Biogeography | Where organisms live reflects continental history and isolation | Proteaceae plants in Australia, southern Africa and South America reflect the former supercontinent Gondwana |
Homologous or analogous?
The first task in building a tree is to decide whether a similarity is homologous (inherited from a common ancestor, with a shared developmental origin) or analogous (independently evolved under similar pressures). Only homologous traits are useful for working out relationships. Complex, multi-part features that overlap are more likely to reflect shared ancestry than simple ones.
The power and limits of molecular data
Molecular systematics uses DNA data to confirm earlier classifications and to reveal past errors. It has limits. A single insertion or deletion can shift a sequence so that closely related organisms seem unrelated, and unrelated organisms can share similar sequences by chance. Combining molecular and anatomical evidence is more reliable than either alone.
Looking alike is not the same as being related. Earlier classifications relied mainly on shared characteristics, which can mislead: closely related groups may look quite different, and unrelated groups may look alike (the hippopotamus and the pig, or bat and bird wings). Modern classification tests appearance against DNA and other evidence.
3Phylogenetic trees and cladograms
A phylogenetic tree is a diagram of evolutionary relationships. A cladogram is a tree that groups organisms by shared characters. Key terms:
- A branch point (node) is where one lineage splits into distinct new lineages; it represents a common ancestor.
- Sister taxa share a branch point and a most recent common ancestor; neither gave rise to the other.
- A clade is a group that includes an ancestor and all of its descendants (a monophyletic group). A group that spans several branch points is not a clade.
- A shared derived character appears partway through the tree and is found only in some members (the amniotic egg in the Amniota). A shared ancestral character appears in a group's ancestor and is found in all its members.
- A polytomy is a branch with more than two lineages, often where relationships are not yet resolved.
- Branch length usually shows evolutionary order and not elapsed time, unless the diagram says otherwise. Rotating branches at a branch point does not change the information.
The principle of maximum parsimony says that the most likely evolutionary pathway is the simplest, the one needing the fewest major events to explain the evidence. Like hikers who usually stay on established trails, evolution is assumed to avoid unnecessary detours unless evidence says otherwise.
Question: In the cladogram above, which is the sister group of the lizard and mouse together, and which character defines the clade containing lizard and mouse?
Answer: The frog branches off just before the lizard-mouse clade, so it is the closest outside group. The lizard and mouse clade is defined by the shared derived character "amniotic egg", which the frog, shark and lamprey lack. A group made of frog and lizard only would not be a clade, because it would leave out the mouse, which shares their most recent common ancestor.
4Taxonomic principles
The hierarchy of taxa
Taxonomy sorts organisms into increasingly inclusive groups called taxa (singular: taxon), in what is often called the Linnaean system. The levels, from broadest to most specific, are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. A common memory aid is "Dear King Philip Came Over For Good Soup". Each level nests inside the one above it, so the system is hierarchical.
The ranks are human conventions, not natural laws. A "family" in one group may represent a very different amount of evolutionary time than a "family" in another group. What carries real meaning is the pattern of nesting, which reflects shared ancestry.
Binomial nomenclature
Scientists refer to organisms by a two-word scientific name: the genus followed by the species. This is binomial nomenclature. The rules are: the genus name is capitalized, the species name is not, and both are italicized (or underlined when handwritten). Examples include Homo sapiens (humans) and Canis lupus (wolf). Scientific names are shared worldwide, while common names such as "dog" differ from place to place and may refer to more than one organism. A name may be abbreviated after first use, for example C. lupus.
Question: Which of these is written correctly as a scientific name: (a) Escherichia Coli, (b) Escherichia coli, (c) escherichia coli, (d) E. Coli?
Answer: (b). The genus is capitalized and the species is lowercase, both italicized. After the first use, the abbreviated form is E. coli (with a lowercase species), so (d) is incorrect.
Dichotomous keys
A dichotomous key is a tool for identifying organisms by their observable traits. It presents a series of numbered steps, each with two choices, and each choice leads either to another step or to an identification. To use a key: make accurate observations, follow the directions carefully, and choose the statement that matches at each step. To build one: use pictures that show the entire organism, base each step on visible traits (not behaviours, such as "hunts at night", which a picture cannot show), and have another student test the key. Keys can be written as numbered couplets or drawn as branching diagrams.
Dichotomous keys are used in field guides to identify plants, insects and fish. A class could build a key for local plants from photographs of leaves and cones, a task suggested by the Curricular Competencies, taking care to base each step on features that can be observed without ambiguity.
5First Peoples knowledge on classification
Classification is not only a Linnaean activity. First Peoples in British Columbia have long-standing systems for organizing knowledge about animals and plants, grounded in relationships, use and place. The curriculum specifically names two examples: classifying animals based on use (for example traditional clothing, food and hunting seasons) and classifying BC plants based on use (for example food and medicine).
- Hundreds of plant, algae and fungi species have individual names in BC Indigenous languages, showing long familiarity with them. Children in each of the province's language groups once learned many plants and their uses, and trained specialists handled tending, harvesting, weaving, carving and healing.
- Plant knowledge is recorded in the context of daily life: materials for fuel, shelter, transportation, clothing, nets, cordage and containers, as well as foods and medicines. One ethnobotanist's reference describes more than 100 plants used in First Nations material culture.
- Animals are known by when and how they can be hunted, what they provide (food, hides, materials for clothing), and how they relate to other species and seasons, as in the salmon and salmonberry relationship described in the first lesson.
| Feature | Linnaean classification | Classification by use and relationship |
|---|---|---|
| Organizing principle | Shared ancestry and shared characters | Use, season, place, relationships among species and people |
| Typical groups | Domain, kingdom, phylum ... species | Foods, medicines, materials for clothing and tools, hunting-season animals |
| Names | Latin binomials, shared worldwide | Names in Indigenous languages, carrying knowledge about the organism |
| Strengths | Universal, tests relationships with evidence | Detailed local knowledge, practical and sustainable management |
Different classification systems answer different questions. A tree of ancestry answers "how are these organisms related?" A system based on use answers "how can these organisms be gathered, prepared and cared for through the year?" Both rest on careful, long-term observation, and they can inform each other.
This knowledge belongs to the Nations and communities who hold it. The Curricular Competencies suggest inviting a local First Peoples Elder to talk with the class about the traditional use of plants and animals, which is the appropriate way to learn it; the summaries here describe only what has been published.
6Domains and kingdoms: the largest groups
The broadest level of classification currently in common use is the domain. Three domains are recognized: Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. The first two are prokaryotes (no nucleus); the Eukarya are organisms with a nucleus and organelles. Within Eukarya, the kingdoms are usually taught as:
| Group | Cell type | Cell wall | Nutrition | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Prokaryotic | Peptidoglycan in most | Varied: autotrophs and heterotrophs | E. coli, cyanobacteria |
| Archaea | Prokaryotic | Present but different in chemistry | Varied; many are extremophiles | Methanogens, halophiles |
| Fungi (Eukarya) | Eukaryotic; mostly multicellular, yeasts unicellular | Chitin | Heterotrophic: absorb nutrients after external digestion; most are decomposers | Mushrooms, yeast, molds |
| Plantae (Eukarya) | Eukaryotic, multicellular | Cellulose | Autotrophic by photosynthesis | Mosses, ferns, conifers, flowering plants |
| Animalia (Eukarya) | Eukaryotic, multicellular | None | Heterotrophic, usually by ingestion | Sponges, insects, fish, mammals |
| Protists (Eukarya) | Eukaryotic, mostly single-celled | Varies | Varied | Amoebas, algae |
Fungi are not plants. Molecular analysis indicates that fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants, and fungi and animals share traits such as chitin, melanin and glycogen storage.
Unifying criteria for classification
Groups are defined by a set of unifying criteria. The most useful are: cell type (prokaryotic or eukaryotic), number of cells (unicellular or multicellular), cell wall composition (peptidoglycan, cellulose or chitin), how energy and carbon are obtained (photosynthesis, absorption or ingestion), and genetic evidence such as DNA similarity. Notice that no single criterion works for every group. A plant and a cyanobacterium both photosynthesize but fall in different domains, while a mushroom and a bacterium both absorb nutrients but also fall in different domains. Classification therefore combines several criteria.
The hierarchical nature of diversity
Living diversity is organized as nested groups: species within genera, genera within families, and so on up to domains. This nesting fits what evolution predicts, because each species descends from an earlier one, and groups of related species share an ancestor. Hierarchy is therefore a consequence of branching descent, not simply a filing convenience.
Question: An organism is multicellular, has a nucleus, cell walls containing chitin, and obtains nutrients by secreting enzymes onto dead material and absorbing the products. To which kingdom does it belong?
Answer: Fungi. Chitin walls and absorptive nutrition (external digestion) are characteristic of fungi, and the nucleus means it is in domain Eukarya. Plants have cellulose walls and photosynthesize, and animals have no cell walls.
7Changing models based on emerging knowledge
Classification is a model, and models change when new evidence arrives. Several examples show this clearly.
- From appearance to DNA. Earlier classifications relied mainly on shared characteristics. DNA technology revealed more precise phylogenies, and some older classifications were revised, as with the hippopotamus and the whale.
- From simple kingdoms to domains. The three-domain system places Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya at the top, based largely on molecular comparisons. It reflects the finding that some eukaryotic genes resemble archaeal genes and others resemble bacterial genes.
- From a tree to a web. Darwin sketched the first phylogenetic tree in 1837, with a single trunk and branches diverging. Horizontal gene transfer, the movement of genes between unrelated species by transformation, transduction, conjugation or gene transfer agents, complicates this picture. Estimates suggest it transfers only about 2% of the prokaryotic genome, though some researchers consider that estimate premature. It also occurs in eukaryotes, for example aphids that acquired fungal genes for carotenoid production. Some biologists propose a "web of life" with multiple trunks and cross-connections. Another proposal, the "ring of life", suggests that all three domains arose from a pool of gene-swapping prokaryotes, but many phylogeneticists remain skeptical.
- Endosymbiosis. The origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts from engulfed prokaryotes means that the eukaryotic cell is itself a merger of lineages (see lesson two).
A phylogenetic tree is a hypothesis about the past, because the proposed relationships cannot be directly confirmed. Systematics combines evidence from fossils, anatomy, molecules and DNA to build and revise trees. Revising a classification when better evidence appears is science working as intended, not a sign of failure.
Viruses do not fit neatly into the domains of life. They are not cells, they have no single common ancestor and their origins are largely unknown, which is why they are classified by a separate system (the Baltimore system) based on how they produce messenger RNA. The rank system is useful but not complete. See the article on the mechanism behind the branching and on the genome comparisons that underpin modern trees.
Applying classification: a short project outline
- Collect photographs or specimens of ten local plants (leaf shape, arrangement, cones or flowers).
- List observable features that differ between them, avoiding features that need behaviour or special equipment.
- Write the key as numbered couplets with two choices each, and have another student test it.
- Build a cladogram using shared derived characters such as vascular tissue, seeds, cones and flowers.
- Compare the key and the cladogram: the key aims to identify quickly, the cladogram to show relationships.
- Where possible, include knowledge of traditional uses learned from a local Elder or community resource, and acknowledge the source.
8Summary
- Phylogenetic relationships are inferred from DNA, biochemistry, anatomy, embryology, fossils and biogeography; homologous traits are informative and analogous traits are not.
- Cladograms show clades defined by shared derived characters; parsimony favours the simplest explanation.
- Taxa run domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species; binomial nomenclature uses genus and species.
- Dichotomous keys identify organisms using paired choices based on observable traits.
- First Peoples classify animals and BC plants by use and relationship, a knowledge system held by communities.
- Three domains (Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya) and kingdoms are defined by cell type, cell number, cell wall, nutrition and DNA; models change as new knowledge emerges.
🔑Key terms
?Quick check
Try each question first, then reveal the answer.
1. Why are bat wings and insect wings poor evidence that bats and insects are closely related?
They are analogous structures: both evolved independently for flight under similar pressures. Only homologous structures inherited from a common ancestor are good evidence for relationship.
2. Name three lines of evidence used to work out phylogenetic relationships and give an example of each.
DNA (DNA suggests the hippopotamus may be the closest living relative of whales), embryology (vertebrate embryos develop gill slits and tails), and biogeography (Proteaceae plants on continents that were once Gondwana).
3. What makes a group a clade, and why is a group of frog and lizard only not a clade in the example cladogram?
A clade contains an ancestor and all of its descendants. Frog and lizard only would exclude the mouse, which shares their common ancestor, so it would not be a clade.
4. List the taxonomic levels in order from broadest to most specific.
Domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species.
5. Write the scientific name of the wolf correctly and explain the rules.
Canis lupus, with the genus capitalized and the species in lower case, both italicized.
6. Why should a dichotomous key use visible traits and not behaviours?
The user must be able to decide each step from the specimen or a picture, and behaviour such as hunting at night cannot be observed in a picture.
7. Give two examples of how First Peoples classify plants or animals by use, and say how this differs from Linnaean classification.
Plants are grouped by use as foods, medicines or materials, and animals by use for food, clothing or by hunting season. This classification is organized around use, season and relationships, while Linnaean classification is organized by shared ancestry.
8. Explain how horizontal gene transfer and DNA evidence have changed the model of the tree of life.
DNA evidence showed more precise relationships and led to revisions such as the three-domain system. Horizontal gene transfer moves genes between unrelated species, so some biologists propose a web of life instead of a single branching tree.
BC curriculum content covered in this lesson
- evidence for phylogenetic relationships: DNA, biochemistry, anatomy, embryology, fossil evidence, biogeography
- taxonomic principles: taxa (kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species)
- taxonomic principles: phylogenetic trees (cladograms)
- taxonomic principles: dichotomous keys
- taxonomic principles: binomial nomenclature
- First Peoples knowledge on classification: classification of animals based on use (e.g., traditional clothing, food, hunting seasons)
- First Peoples knowledge on classification: classification of BC plants based on use (e.g., food, medicine)
- similarities and differences between domains and kingdoms: unifying criteria for classification
- similarities and differences between domains and kingdoms: hierarchical nature of diversity
- similarities and differences between domains and kingdoms: changing models based on emerging knowledge
References
- BC Ministry of Education. Life Sciences 11 (BC curriculum). Accessed October 7, 2026.
- BC Ministry of Education. Life Sciences 11: First Peoples knowledge on classification (Elaboration page). Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Organizing Life on Earth. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Determining Evolutionary Relationships. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Perspectives on the Phylogenetic Tree. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Understanding Evolution. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Characteristics of Fungi. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- OpenStax. Biology 2e: Prokaryotic Diversity. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- US National Park Service. Dichotomous key (for teachers). Accessed October 7, 2026.
- BC Studies (UBC). Indigenous plant knowledge and ethnobotany in British Columbia. Accessed October 7, 2026.
- 49th Shelf. Plant Technology of First Peoples of British Columbia (book description). Accessed October 7, 2026.
- Bioninja. Molecular clock. Accessed October 7, 2026.
These lessons follow the content areas listed in the British Columbia curriculum. They are study material written for this site and are not an official document. The official curriculum is the authority on what each course requires. Lessons are general education, not medical advice.
